This is the channel for the discussion of metaphysical and parapsychological subjects. Please keep discussion of these topics to this channel and out of the rest of the server.
Were they anti-tulpa sex in general? I seem to recall a lot of the old guides seeming to make it a sticking point that making a tulpa for sex was unthinkably abusive.
I think they were more differentiated than that. More like, "don't make a tulpa for the purpose of sex, but if attraction develops as the tulpa grows independent, it can be okay"(edited)
But I believe that aversion to incest is purely instinctual and what is wrong is potential negative impact on descendants genetic pool and risk of grooming involved.
12:56 AM
I think that incest should be accepted when blood related siblings weren't raised together in one family and don't plan to have children
Also pregnancies over the age of 40 (ish?) have a higher chance of genetic fuckery than incest pregnancies (on average or whatever), but there are no laws against the former(edited)
Also pregnancies over the age of 40 (ish?) have a higher chance of genetic fuckery than incest pregnancies (on average or whatever), but there are no laws against the former
@Unfastened Belts - jump
Those two cases are much different. Incest isn't even just bad by itself. What it does is creating homozygouses.
Incest in isolated cases have a minor chance of genetic abnormalities. Consanguinity tends to become a problem over generations. It is actually a cultural issue.
The cultural inoculation against incest, is amusingly, an inoculation against a bad culture, rather than incest itself.
Zen
Incest in isolated cases have a minor chance of genetic abnormalities. Consanguinity tends to become a problem over generations. It is actually a cultural issue.
i hope you do understand noone is falling for that
Unfastened Belts
I think they were more differentiated than that. More like, "don't make a tulpa for the purpose of sex, but if attraction develops as the tulpa grows independent, it can be okay" (edited)